To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
2 comments on “KCG response to University banner planning application”
I entirely agree with those opposing the University’s Banner Proposals and am shocked that anyone in charge of the Universities affairs, would think it a good idea. Not only as it has been already suggested add unnecesary clutter, of which there is already too much in Bristol .Surely University students can find their way about without such pointers? There are already elegant sign posts., maps and for the gadget obsessed Satnav. I would prefer enhancement of the invironment not downgrading. Elizabeth A Watts Miller
I am in complete agreement with the Kingsdown Conservation Group’s reply to the university’s banner proposals. The University lies within an inhabited city. The proposed signs appear to back up the idea that the street is part of a campus when it is no such thing. They will make the street look messy and cluttered and there is no need for them anyway. In fact current planning regulations already rule them out – why are the University authorities ignorant of these rules, or so they imagine they do not apply to a university?