To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
2 comments on “7 Myrtle Road response to proposal to convert to multi-occupation”
I agree with the comments above: the university should be more sympathetic to the residents who live here and to its status as a Conservation Area.
There is a disproportionate radio of students to residents in the area already. High Kingsdown is struggling to keep it’s origional character and the community which it was designed for. Alfred Place will become affected just at a time when we have four new families with children moving in. The area suffers already for boom and bust as the students come in terms and leave in holidays. There is not enough parking space in term times despite residents parking. The scheme for the development for the Kings Arms within High Kingsdown was democratically overturned by the residents, only to be re-instated by appeal.